چکیده :
یتردید عقل در ایجاد و توسعه معرفت و بتبع آن در معرفت دینی نقش اساسی دارد.
شکل گیری فهم از دین و شریعت نیز به عقل بشری مرتبط است و نوعی همبستگی میان دین و عقل برقرار است.
اما اندیشمندان در چگونگی، حدود و ارتباط آن با معرفت وحیانی اختلاف نظر دارند.
در این تحقیق، دیدگاه محمد عابد الجابری که از جمله جریانات فکری نوین معاصر است با دیدگاه علّامه طباطبائی به صورت تطبیقی در این زمینهها مدنظر بوده تا ظرفیتهای هر کدام برای پاسخگویی به مسائل اجتماعی و سیاسی در حوزه دین سنجیده شود.
بر این اساس، موضوع پژوهش این چنین سامان یافت؛ «بررسی تطبیقی مبانی عقلانیت از نگاه علّامه طباطبائی و محمد الجابری».
روش توصیفی-تحلیلی در آثار هر دو اندیشمند پیشرفته و شاخصههای مؤثر در عقلانیت هر کدام را احصاء نموده.
یافتههای تحقیق نشان داد که مبانی عقلانیت عبارتند از: در اندیشه الجابری، فرهنگ، جامعه، تاریخ در تکون عقل اصالت داشته و منحصر در آنهاست ولی در نگاه علّامه طباطبائی، دین، وحی و فطرت توحیدی اصالت داشته و نقش فرهنگ، جامعه و تاریخ در تکون عقل در چارچوب دستگاه آفرینش و تحت هدایت الهی نقش ایفا مینمایند.
according to many thinkers, reason plays an important role in the creation and development of human knowledge.
despite the challenges in the religious field, the role of reason in the creation and development of religious knowledge is undeniable, and a kind of correlation exists between religion and reason.
regardless of some differences, a rationalist understanding of religion and sharia and the authority of reason in understanding sharia have existed throughout different eras.
reason tries to justify and express the understanding of sharia with the changing conditions of time and place.
therefore, it is necessary to discuss the understanding of reason, various attitudes towards reason, and the use of reason as an epistemological tool.however, the main issue is the independence of reason and its relationship with revealed knowledge etc., which are disputed.
on the one hand, the neo-religionist movement, which is considered a modern movement, views the power of reason as unlimited, and we witness criticisms they make in the field of traditional religion.among them, muhammad abed al-jabri, who is attributed to this movement, has a special approach to reason because he has dealt more with the category of reason and enumerated its different meanings.
the result of that constitutes his epistemological system and is considered.
on the other hand, among those who have been able to deal with religion and its issues with a maximal rational approach is allamah ṭabāṭabāʾī.from the perspective of this philosopher, who has a special approach to reason, human thoughts, as required by their nature, benefit from everything for their true perfection and do not submit to imitation.in this research, the view of muhammad abed al-jabri, who is among the modern contemporary intellectual movements, has been considered comparatively with the view of allamah ṭabāṭabāʾī in these fields to assess the capacities of each to respond to social and political issues in the field of religion.accordingly, "a comparative study of the foundations of rationality from the perspective of allamah ṭabāṭabāʾī as a shiite commentator and muhammad al-jabri as a neo-mu'tazilite thinker" is the aim of this article, which uses a descriptive-analytical method in the works of both advanced thinkers and enumerates the effective characteristics of each in rationality.