چکیده :
this question seems somewhat for each of the unheard of or read about in this section, or in other words, does tolerance) was (from anhmamat and concerns of philosophers in the genesis of the first philosophy, to this day, like the interest in the city, the state, and the universe, and prove the existence of god shocking and the immortality of the soul, happiness, justice, power and act, war and peace, duty, and the possible occurrence and foot, and the list goes on ??.
or that the interest of tolerance when philosophers have brought him a knowledge of another area, and here special mention of the religious sphere, the diversity of this area and interests, and imposing presence on the philosophical thought.then, do the philosophers wrote in tolerance and looked in it and defended him, and made him philosophical saying her moral and cognitive, political and human rights dimensions, bdafhm their personal and their community's political and systems, or as a result of the presence of overwhelming to tolerate tolerance in, which morse behavior strongly within the religious and political systems in those covenants, particularly the mediator of the christian era and even the beginnings of the era of european renaissance ???.
though it may the sacred religious text except himself of bigotry and intolerance, and to the side of tolerance and respect for others, and the evidence of many sacred religious texts, which can not fail to mention.