چکیده :
پژوهش‌های فلسفی در باب ذاتِ آزادی انسان[1] (1809)، که به رسالۀ آزادی[2] نامبردار است، تلاش شلینگ برای بنیان‌گذاریِ نظام آزادی است.
دغدغۀ اصلی شلینگ در این رساله رفع تقابلِ آزادی و ضرورت است، تقابلی که به نظر او مدار و محور فلسفه است.
اصلی که در جستجوی بنیادی برای شکل‌گیریِ نظام و راه‌حلی برای سازگاری نظام و آزادی به آن تمسک می‌جوید «این‌همانی» به‌معنای صحیح آن است که در همه‌خداانگاری به‌مثابۀ تنها نظام ممکنِ عقل ممکن می‌گردد.
او با طرح و رد تعابیر ممکن و البته جبرگرایانه از همه‌خداانگاری به‌ویژه در نظام اسپینوزا و لایب‌نیتس، نه‌تنها به تصحیح آنها می‌پردازد، بلکه نشان می‌دهد که منجرشدنِ نظام همه‌خداانگاری به جبرگرایی نتیجۀ فهم نادرستِ هستی‌شناختی و سوءفهم‌های حاصل از آن است.
به دیگر سخن، زمینۀ نادرستی که ریشۀ چنین سوءفهم‌هایی شده، سوءتفسیر در معنای واقعیِ «است» و نقش رابط در گزاره است.
در این پژوهش نشان داده می‌شود که بنابر نظر شلینگ چگونه سوءتفسیر از این اصل، امکان ناسازگاری نظام و آزادی را در تعریف‌های مختلف از همه‌خداانگاری فراهم می‌آورد و تفسیر شلینگ از ضرورت توجه به «است» چگونه راه به پرسش هستی‌شناختی از معنا و حقیقتِ هستی در اندیشۀ ایدئالیسم آلمانی می‌بَرَد.
خوانش انتقادیِ تلاش شلینگ برای رفع سوءتفسیرهای ممکن از این‌همانی، با اولویت مسائل هستی‌شناختی در موضوعات الهیاتی همچون همه‌خداانگاری و تبیین اصل اساسیِ واحدی برای برپایی یک نظام به‌مثابۀ ساختار نظام‌مندِ هستی معنا می‌یابد.
the philosophical investigations in to the essence of human freedom (1809), known as the treatise on freedom, is schelling's attempt to establish a system of freedom.
schelling's main concern in this treatise is to resolve the confrontation between freedom and necessity, which, in his view, is the focus of philosophy.
schelling's main concern in this treatise is to resolve the confrontation between freedom and necessity, which, in his view, is the focus of philosophy.
the principle pursued in the fundamental search for the formation of the system and the solution for the conformity of the system and freedom is " identity", which in the true sense means that in pantheism it becomes possible as the only possible system of reason.
by proposing and rejecting possible and deterministic interpretations of pantheism, especially in the system of spinoza and leibniz, he not only corrects them, but shows that the leading system of pantheism to determinism is the result of a misunderstood ontological understanding.
this study shows how, according to schelling, misinterpretation of this principle allows the incompatibility of system and freedom in different definitions of pantheism.
and how schelling's interpretation of the need to pay attention to "is" leads to an ontological question of the meaning and truth of being in the thought of german idealism.
a critical reading of schelling's attempt to eliminate possible misinterpretations of identity means prioritizing ontological issues over theological issues such as pantheism and explaining a single basic principle for establishing a system as the jointure of the order of being.in order to answer the relationship between pantheism and freedom, we turn to reflection on different interpretations of schelling's pantheism, this is done by criticizing and examining the errors in spinoza's and leibniz's misinterpretations of pantheism.
then, by discussing "is" and showing schelling's transition from the usual understanding of the principle of identity, we question the true meaning of identity.
finally, we come to the position of answering this question, how does schelling, with the correct interpretation of the true meaning of "is" in these statements, look for a foundation for the formation of the system and a solution for the compatibility of the system and freedom? based on schelling's new understanding of the principle of identity, the leading of a pantheistic system to determinism does not arise from its pantheistic and theological elements, but is the result of ontological misunderstanding and resulting misunderstandings.
the wrong context that has become the root of such misunderstandings is the misunderstanding of the meaning of "is" and the role of the conjunction in the sentence.
therefore, the question of pantheism, as a question of the system, leads to the question of "is" and this means changing and transforming the theological question into an ontological question and planning the ontological foundations of the freedom system.
heidegger uses this material to show that the determining element in the question of pantheism is the ontological element, and according to this meaning of the principle of identity, the question of the possibility of a system of freedom is related to the adequate understanding of existence and its fundamental determination, and the question about pantheism is considered he attributes the question about the system to the question of "is" and the way of connecting the jointure of beings.
نویسنده :
احمد عبادی ، الهام السادات کریمی دورکی
منبع اصلی :
https://jop.ut.ac.ir/article_88645_b831eafd6f5e73d6427ee8997cfda2e1.pdf
پایگاه :
پایگاه مجلات 5
(فلسفه (دانشگاه تهران)- سال 1401- دوره 20- شماره 2- از صفحه 193 تا 211)
یادداشت :
کلیدواژه‌ها
شلینگ نظام همه‌خداانگاری این‌همانی سوءتفسیر
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Schilling System pantheism identity misinterpretation