چکیده :
چکیده
در این جستار کوشش شده است نسبت میان فلسفه و علوم انسانی با نگاهی نو و باتوجه‌به بنیادهای هرمنوتیکی آنها بررسی و مطالعه شود.
مطابق ادعای این مقاله، هر رشته و شاخۀ معرفت موجود در علوم انسانی نگاهی مابعدالطبیعی و فلسفی دارد که بر مبنای بنیادی هرمنوتیکی ایجاد شده است؛ بنابراین، علوم‌انسانی از فلسفه و مابعدالطبیعه بی‌نیاز نیست.
در این پژوهش با در نظر گرفتن نسبتی که انسان با فهم و تفسیر و به‌طور عام با «هرمنوتیک» دارد، ضمن سخن‌گفتن از ضرورت کثرت‌انگاری در ساحت فلسفه و مابعدالطبیعه، نشان داده است چگونه رشته‌های مختلف موجود در حوزه علوم انسانی به‌ناچار باید نگاهی کلی و کلانی داشته باشند و این موضوع، در حوزۀ برتری از شناخت، یعنی همان معرفت مابعدالطبیعی آشکار می‌شود.
درپایان، باتوجه‌به ایده‌های ارائه‌شده در نسبت میان فلسفه و علوم‌انسانی و نکات موجود در نسبت میان متعاطی مابعدالطبیعه و عالمان علوم انسانی نشان داده شده است چگونه بر مبنای این بنیاد هرمنوتیکی از امکان ظهور «مابعدالطبیعه‌های خاص» سخن گفته می‌شود و علوم‌انسانی چگونه در چنین بستری (با در نظر گرفتن نیازهای بومی، ملی، دینی و فرهنگی ما) پرورش و کمال می‌یابد.
همچنین، از رهگذر مناسبات احتمالی موجود در میان فلسفه و علوم‌انسانی چگونه می‌شود برای پژوهشگران به‌منظور مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای راهی را گشود.
چکیده [english]
in this essay, an attempt is made to reflect on the relation between philosophy and humanities, with a new look and attention to its hermeneutical foundations.
the assertion of this study is that there is every kind of branch of knowledge that exists in the philanthropists, which is based on a metaphysical and philosophical look that is based on a hermeneutic foundation.
hence, for humanities, there is no possibility of spontaneity in philosophy and metaphysics.
according to the relation that man has with understanding and in general, "hermeneutics", we have spoken about the pluralism in the field of philosophy and metaphysics, and we showed how different disciplines which is in the field of humanism, must inevitably be based on a general and profound view that reveals itself in the domain of excellence, which is metaphysical knowledge.
at the end of this paper, we have shown how, based on this hermeneutical foundation, the possibility of the emergence of "special metaphysics", based on the ideas on the relation between philosophy and humanities, and the points that can exist in the relation between metaphysics and scholars of humanities, it is possible to speak and how the holiness in such a situation (according to our indigenous, national, religious, and cultural needs) is matured and perfected, and we have also pointed out that how can one find a way through the relations that can exist between philosophy and humanities?
"philosophical hermeneutics," or more precisely, "hermeneutical philosophy" is a phenomenological approach to the category of "understanding," which the philosophical foundation reflects on the understanding and process of realization of understanding.
therefore, all human existential proportions are formed on the basis of the understanding and relationship of the deity with the being, and all predecessors, preconceptions and predecessors constituting the existential identity of his understanding, and of course, may originate from a diverse range of subjects, such as society, religion, politics, culture, the family ...
and many other things that somehow compromise human qualities or, in the words of heidegger, in the universe.
of course, this expression should not lead to the illusion that the criterion and the areas of truth are lost, and that pluralism occurs in the realm of knowledge, and ultimately leads to relativism and skepticism.
because heidegger himself was also aware of this, he spoke of the remoteness of understanding, which is an integral part of the structure and conditionality of understanding, and understanding without it is not possible.
dasein, though initially, approaches his identification with his earlier understanding.
but there is the possibility of rival projections that, with consideration of the subject, will be successively combined to achieve a meaningful unity for dasein.
therefore, the mission of the practice of understanding and interpretation is to find suitable projections, and in these projections, with different origins of understanding and interpretation, different horizons are intermingled and the possibility of dialogue between them is provided.
this discernment is more in the field of humanities, since, as mentioned at the beginning of this essay, the foundations of methodology, ontology, anthropology, and epistemology, and many other such metaphysical foundations interfere in the understanding and interpretation and process.
despite this interdependence, which occurs in the process of understanding and interpretation, it can be spoken in the context of the philosophic and social as a result of the plurality and multiplicity of metaphysical foundations of humanism or socialism with a religious or secular, islamic or christian and jewish character.
because that stipulates this waiver.
even more so, we can speak of religious and islamic culture from various religious and islamic diversities, and, on the other hand, under western culture and civilization, we also see different scholars based on different philosophies and philosophical schools.
turning to the hermeneutic foundation in this article, the groundwork of ideas and theories, and theorizing reflection and exploration in diverse and varied approaches to the philosopher's will provide.
the attentiveness of opinion and dialogue between philosophers and specialists in humanities leads to a desirable outcome if, on the one hand, the philosopher and the scholars of philosophy of studies are in the realm of experiences associated with humanism, in such a way that he addresses the main methods and fundamental concepts in which science is used to recognize.
on the other hand, those working in the field of humanities must also become acquainted with the language of philosophers, so that they can work together in a mutually beneficial way and open up new horizons.
regarding what was said in this essay, it becomes clear that the philosopher (with the new approach we talked about in this essay) cannot provide for metaphysical philosophies and contemplations, but at the same time, given the pluralism that exists in philosophical reflections we are confronted with a large number of philosophers and philosophical schools that may have a fundamental difference between them while they share common ground in their thoughts.
there are various approaches philosophers can have on certain issues such as being, truth, human beings, society, religion, etc., as well as the attention of philosophers and metaphysical subjects to the achievements of other branches of human sciences and sciences, and as a result these interdisciplinary studies also lead to a variety of different perspectives and developments in various branches of folklore.
humanities in the contemporary world are faced with a fundamental challenge.
contemporary humanities based on the principles of theology, anthropology and epistemology and other basic principles, and so far as these foundations, with regard to the scientific and epistemic heritage of mankind, do not change in other branches of science, we cannot see a change in the native and patriotic humanities.